64Ni(p,n)64Cu


Bibliography of experimental data

 

 

Twelve publications with experimental cross-section data were identified in the literature for incident particle energies up to 30 MeV and are represented with uncertainties in Fig. All data. Two additional sets by Nemashkalo et al. (1983) (partial cross sections near the threshold), and by Treytl et al. (1966), only including data points above 100 MeV, are not represented in the figure. The EXFOR data are used but were corrected for abundance of the total β- emission where necessary. The original data of Levkovskij (1991) were corrected by a factor 0.8 for the outdated value of the monitor reaction used. The results of four studies were rejected and the reasons for their removal are indicated. The remaining eight datasets were considered as input for a least-squares Pade fit. The data by Guzhovskij et al., obtained with high energy resolution, show several resonances between 2 and 6 MeV but are overall somewhat lower than the other datasets. An energy dependent correction factor, determined by comparing with a Pade fit to the other selected data sets (about 20%), was applied before fitting. The Pade functions with 44 parameters were fitted to 576 selected data points with a χ2 =2.24 and covering the energy range up to 25 MeV as shown in Fig. Recommended. The uncertainties (including a 4% systematic uncertainty) range between 48% near the reaction threshold, decrease to below 10% at 5 MeV, remain around 8% between 6 and 16 MeV and reach 10% at the highest energy.

 

 

 

 

R. Adam Rebeles, P. Van den Winkel, A. Hermanne, F. T. Tarkanyi,

“New measurement and evaluation of the excitation function of 64Ni(p,n) reaction for the production of 64Cu,”

Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. B267, 457–461 (2009);

EXFOR D4207.

 

* A. E. Antropov, V. P. Gusev, Yu. Yu. Zhuravlev, P. P. Zarubin, A. A. Kolozhvari, A. V. Smirnov,

“Total cross sections of (p,n) reaction on the nuclei of isotopes nickel and zinc at e/p=5.-6. MeV,“

Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Fiz. 56, 198 (1992);

EXFOR A0543.

Remarks: two data points, too high

 

M. A. Avila-Rodriguez, J. A. Nye, R. J. Nickles,

“Simultaneous production of high specific activity 64Cu and 61Cu with 11.4MeV protons on enriched 64Ni nuclei,”

App. Radiat. Isot. 65, 1115–1120 (2007);

EXFOR C1600.

 

J. P. Blaser, F. Bohm, P. Marmier, P. Scherrer,

“Anregungsfunctionen und Wirkungsquerschnitte der (p,n)-Reaktion (II),”

Helv. Phys. Acta 24, 441 (1951);

EXFOR P0033.

 

* H. G. Blosser and T. H. Handley,

“Survey of (p,n) reactions at 12 MeV,”

Phys. Rev. 100, 1340 (1955);

EXFOR B0052.

Remarks: single point, discrepant

 

B. Ja. Guzhovskij, I. M. Borkin, A. G. Zvenigorodskij, V. S. Rudnev, A. P. Solodovnikov, S. V. Trusillo,

“Isospin mixing of isobar analog resonances observed for the 59,61,63,65Cu nuclei,”

Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Fiz. 33, 129 (1969),

EXFOR F0704.

 

* V. N. Levkovskij,

“Activation cross section nuclides of average masses (A=40-100) by protons and alpha-particles with average energies (E=10–50 MeV),”

INTER-VESTI, Moscow, 1991;

EXFOR A0510.

Remarks: values to high over the whole energy region and shifted to higher energy

 

M. E. Sevior, L. W. Mitchell, M. R. Anderson, C. W. Tingwell, D. G. Sargood,

“Absolute cross sections of proton induced reactions on 65Cu, 64Ni, 63Cu,”

Austr. J. Phys. 36, 463 (1983);

EXFOR A0198.

 

F. Szelecsenyi, G. Blessing, S. M. Qaim,

“Excitation functions of proton induced nuclear reactions on enriched 61Ni and 64Ni: Possibility of production of no-carrieradded 61Cu and 64Cu at a small cyclotron,”

Appl. Radiat. Isot. 44, 575–580 (1993);

EXFOR D4020.

 

* S. Tanaka, M. Furukawa,

“Excitation functions for (p,n) reactions with titanium, vanadium, chromium, iron and nickel up to 14 MeV,”

J. Phys. Soc. Japan 14, 1269 (1959);

EXFOR B0043.

Remarks: strange shape and scatter below the maximum

 

S. Tanaka, M. Furukawa, M. Chiba,

“Nuclear reactions of nickel with protons up to 56 MeV,”

J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 34, 2419 (1972);

EXFOR B0020.

 

Md. S. Uddin, A. K. Chakraborty, S. Spellerberg, Md. A. Shariff, S. Das, Md. A. Rashid, I. Spahn, S. M. Qaim,

“Experimental determination of proton induced reaction cross sections on natNi near threshold,”

Radioch. Acta 104, 305–314 (2016);

EXFOR D0802.

 

B. A. Nemashkalo, Yu. P. Melnik, V. E. Storizhko, K. V. Shebeko,

“Radiative capture of protons by nuclei 54Cr

and 64Ni near the threshold of the (p,n) reaction,”

Yad. Fiz. 37, 3 (1983);

EXFOR A0112, not in figure.

 

W. J. Treytl and A. A. Caretto Jr.,

“Study of (p,n) reactions between 100 and 400 MeV,”

Phys. Rev. 146, 836 (1966);

EXFOR C0389, Not in figure.

 

 

 

 

Yield

 

 

 

R. J. Nickles,

A shotgun approach to the chart of the nuclides; Radiotracer production with an 11 MeV proton cyclotron, Acta Radiologica, Supplementum 376 (1991) 9.

Exfor: none

 

D.W. McCarthy, R.E. Shefer, R.E. Klinkowstein, L.A. Bass, W.H. Margeneau, C.S. Cutler, C.J. Anderson, M.J. Welch,

Efficient production of high specific activity 64Cu using a biomedical cyclotron, Nuclear Medicine and Biology 24 (1997) 35. Exfor: none

 

A. Obata, S. Kasamatsu, D.W. McCarthy, M.J. Welch, H. Saji, Y. Yonekura, Y. Fujibayashi,

Production of therapeutic quantities of 64Cu using a 12 MeV cyclotron, Nuclear Medicine and Biology 30 (2003) 535.

Exfor: none.

 

M.A. Avila-Rodriguez, J.A. Nye, R.J. Nickles,

Simultaneous production of high specific activity 64Cu and 61Co with 11.4 MeV protons on enriched 64Ni nuclei,

Applied Radiation and Isotopes 65 (2007) 1115.

Exfor: none

 

 

Top of the page


  Last updated: Aug.2021.