ENTRY A0319 20231225 A105A0319 0 1 SUBENT A0319001 20231225 A105A0319 1 1 BIB 11 45 A0319 1 2 TITLE Excitation functions for 3-He and alpha-induced A0319 1 3 reactions with 107-Ag and 109-Ag. A0319 1 4 AUTHOR (P.Misaelides,H.Munzel) A0319 1 5 INSTITUTE (2GERKFK) Institute of Radiochemistry. A0319 1 6 REFERENCE (J,JIN,42,937,1980) A0319 1 7 FACILITY (ISOCY,2GERKFK) A0319 1 8 METHOD (STTA,ACTIV) A0319 1 9 (GSPEC) A0319 1 10 DETECTOR (GELI) Two Ge(Li)-detectors having an effective volume A0319 1 11 of 42 and 27 cm3. The corresponding resolution was A0319 1 12 2.15 and 2.85 keV for the 1.332 MeV peak of 60Co. A0319 1 13 ANALYSIS With the natural silver foils the sum of the excitationA0319 1 14 functions of the reactions of both silver isotopes A0319 1 15 leading to the same reaction products was determined. A0319 1 16 Subtracting from this sum the contribution of the A0319 1 17 reactions with Ag-107, determined by irradiations of A0319 1 18 enriched Ag-107 foils, the excitation functions of the A0319 1 19 corresponding reactions on Ag-109 were obtained. A0319 1 20 ADD-RES (RANGE) A0319 1 21 (COMP) A0319 1 22 ERR-ANALYS * the analysis of the gamma-ray spectra. A0319 1 23 The uncertainty due to the analysis of the gamma- A0319 1 24 spectra differs from case to case. Much greater A0319 1 25 uncertainties were taken into account in those cases A0319 1 26 where complex peak evaluation and subtraction of A0319 1 27 activities could not be avoided during the calculation A0319 1 28 of the cross sections. In many of these cases only a A0319 1 29 rough lower limit estimation of the error could be A0319 1 30 given. A0319 1 31 (ERR-1) The uncertainty due to foil thickness; A0319 1 32 (ERR-2) The uncertainty due to beam current; A0319 1 33 (ERR-3) The uncertainty due to detector efficiency; A0319 1 34 HISTORY (19861216C) A0319 1 35 (20011009A) Reaction lines are corrected. Four A0319 1 36 Subentries are added. Lower case. A0319 1 37 (20011018A) Date is corrected A0319 1 38 (20020321U) Last checking has been done. A0319 1 39 (20160130A) SD: BIB section updated in all Subents. A0319 1 40 Small corrections in all Subents. DECAY-DATA corrected A0319 1 41 in Subents 011, 021, 027, 034 (MEMO CP-D/888). A0319 1 42 ANALYSIS (AREA) deleted (not relevant) A0319 1 43 (20200201U) SD: Small correction in Subents 017, 027, A0319 1 44 032.033. A0319 1 45 (20200401A) SD: Corrections in several Subents. A0319 1 46 (20231225A) SD: Corrections in all Subents. A0319 1 47 ENDBIB 45 0 A0319 1 48 COMMON 3 3 A0319 1 49 ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 A0319 1 50 PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT A0319 1 51 3. 2. 3. A0319 1 52 ENDCOMMON 3 0 A0319 1 53 ENDSUBENT 52 0 A0319 199999 SUBENT A0319002 20231225 A105A0319 2 1 BIB 9 22 A0319 2 2 REACTION (47-AG-107(HE3,N)49-IN-109,,SIG) A0319 2 3 SAMPLE (47-AG-107,ENR=0.9854) The target stacks consisted up A0319 2 4 to three 7.87E-3 gr/cm2 thick 98.54% enriched A0319 2 5 107-Ag foils interspersed by aluminum catcher foil. A0319 2 6 The copper foil was added to the stack to enable a A0319 2 7 flux measurement via the monitor reaction. A0319 2 8 MONITOR (29-CU-65(HE3,2N)31-GA-66,,SIG) A0319 2 9 DECAY-MON (31-GA-66,9.3HR,DG,1039.5,0.3732) A0319 2 10 DECAY-DATA (49-IN-109-G,4.2HR,DG,204.,0.68) A0319 2 11 The contribution of 107-In to this peak is subtracted. A0319 2 12 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty includes all sources A0319 2 13 mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 2 14 COMMENT -By Authors: Measurement performed after the decay of A0319 2 15 the metastable state. The cross sections calculated A0319 2 16 are the sum of the cross sections of both isomeric A0319 2 17 states. A0319 2 18 STATUS (DEP,A0319034) Average values for monitor cross sect. A0319 2 19 (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 2 A0319 2 20 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: STATUS added. BIB update. A0319 2 21 SF4=In-109g -> In-109; SF5=M+ deleted in REACTION code A0319 2 22 (see COMMENT). A0319 2 23 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 2 24 ENDBIB 22 0 A0319 2 25 COMMON 1 3 A0319 2 26 ERR-T A0319 2 27 PER-CENT A0319 2 28 13. A0319 2 29 ENDCOMMON 3 0 A0319 2 30 DATA 2 10 A0319 2 31 EN DATA A0319 2 32 MEV MB A0319 2 33 13.4 2.2 A0319 2 34 15.4 3.4 A0319 2 35 19.5 5.7 A0319 2 36 21.5 5.8 A0319 2 37 23.6 7.2 A0319 2 38 27.6 5.8 A0319 2 39 30.6 5.4 A0319 2 40 33.6 4.3 A0319 2 41 35.7 3.8 A0319 2 42 39.7 2.4 A0319 2 43 ENDDATA 12 0 A0319 2 44 ENDSUBENT 43 0 A0319 299999 SUBENT A0319003 20231225 A105A0319 3 1 BIB 9 24 A0319 3 2 REACTION G(47-AG-107(HE3,2N)49-IN-108-M,,SIG) A0319 3 3 M(47-AG-107(HE3,2N)49-IN-108-G,,SIG) A0319 3 4 SAMPLE (47-AG-107,ENR=0.9854) The target stacks consisted up A0319 3 5 to three 7.87E-3 gr/cm2 thick 98.54% enriched A0319 3 6 107-Ag foils interspersed by aluminum catcher foil. A0319 3 7 The copper foil was added to the stack to enable a A0319 3 8 flux measurement via the monitor reaction. A0319 3 9 MONITOR (29-CU-65(HE3,2N)31-GA-66,,SIG) A0319 3 10 DECAY-MON (31-GA-66,9.3HR,DG,1039.5,0.3732) A0319 3 11 DECAY-DATA (49-IN-108-M,40.MIN,DG,633.2,0.764) A0319 3 12 (49-IN-108-G,58.MIN,DG,387.6,0.13, A0319 3 13 DG,633.2,1., A0319 3 14 DG,876.0,0.85, A0319 3 15 DG,1032.3,0.20, A0319 3 16 DG,1056.3,0.25) A0319 3 17 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~13.%) includes all A0319 3 18 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 3 19 COMMENT -By Authors: Measurement performed after the decay A0319 3 20 of 106-In. A0319 3 21 STATUS (DEP,A0319034) Average values for monitor cross sect. A0319 3 22 (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 2 A0319 3 23 HISTORY (20160130U) SD: STATUS added. BIB update. A0319 3 24 (20231225A) SD: In-108-M and In-108-G were swapped A0319 3 25 in REACTION codes and DECAY-DATA. STATUS updated. A0319 3 26 ENDBIB 24 0 A0319 3 27 COMMON 1 3 A0319 3 28 ERR-T A0319 3 29 PER-CENT A0319 3 30 13. A0319 3 31 ENDCOMMON 3 0 A0319 3 32 DATA 3 17 A0319 3 33 EN DATA GDATA M A0319 3 34 MEV MB MB A0319 3 35 12.3 1.3 1.1 A0319 3 36 13.4 22. 9.7 A0319 3 37 15.3 32. 22. A0319 3 38 15.4 41. 35. A0319 3 39 18.0 44. 44. A0319 3 40 19.5 41. 68. A0319 3 41 19.7 37. 64. A0319 3 42 21.5 23. 53. A0319 3 43 23.0 17. 45. A0319 3 44 23.1 17. 45. A0319 3 45 23.6 11.4 39. A0319 3 46 24.6 34. A0319 3 47 27.6 7.9 21. A0319 3 48 30.6 7.4 15. A0319 3 49 33.6 6.6 12. A0319 3 50 35.7 12. A0319 3 51 39.7 7.5 10. A0319 3 52 ENDDATA 19 0 A0319 3 53 ENDSUBENT 52 0 A0319 399999 SUBENT A0319004 20231225 A105A0319 4 1 BIB 9 23 A0319 4 2 REACTION (47-AG-107(HE3,3N)49-IN-107,,SIG) A0319 4 3 SAMPLE (47-AG-107,ENR=0.9854) The target stacks consisted up A0319 4 4 to three 7.87E-3 gr/cm2 thick 98.54% enriched A0319 4 5 107-Ag foils interspersed by aluminum catcher foil. A0319 4 6 The copper foil was added to the stack to enable a A0319 4 7 flux measurement via the monitor reaction. A0319 4 8 COMMENT - By Authors: A0319 4 9 Measurement performed after decay of metastable state. A0319 4 10 the cross sections calculated are the sum of the cross A0319 4 11 sections of both isomeric states. the contribution of A0319 4 12 109-In to this peak is subtracted. A0319 4 13 MONITOR (29-CU-65(HE3,2N)31-GA-66,,SIG) A0319 4 14 DECAY-MON (31-GA-66,9.3HR,DG,1039.5,0.3732) A0319 4 15 DECAY-DATA (49-IN-107-G,32.4MIN,DG,205.,0.485) A0319 4 16 (49-IN-107-M,52.SEC) 100% Isomeric Transition. A0319 4 17 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~14.%) includes all A0319 4 18 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS ( see Subent 001). A0319 4 19 STATUS (DEP,A0319034) Average values for monitor cross sect. A0319 4 20 (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 2 A0319 4 21 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: STATUS added. BIB update. A0319 4 22 SF4=In-107g -> In-107; SF5=M+ deleted in REACTION code A0319 4 23 (see COMMENT). A0319 4 24 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 4 25 ENDBIB 23 0 A0319 4 26 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 4 27 DATA 3 20 A0319 4 28 EN DATA ERR-T A0319 4 29 MEV MB MB A0319 4 30 15.3 0.5 7.E-02 A0319 4 31 18.0 12. 2.0 A0319 4 32 19.5 48. 6.7 A0319 4 33 19.7 30. 4.2 A0319 4 34 21.5 83. 11.6 A0319 4 35 23.1 92. 12.9 A0319 4 36 23.6 148. 17.0 A0319 4 37 26.2 155. 21.7 A0319 4 38 27.6 180. 25.2 A0319 4 39 28.6 161. 22.5 A0319 4 40 30.6 193. 27.0 A0319 4 41 32.2 123. 20.0 A0319 4 42 33.1 128. 17.9 A0319 4 43 33.6 144. 20.2 A0319 4 44 34.3 130. 18.2 A0319 4 45 35.7 126. 17.6 A0319 4 46 36.4 84. 11.8 A0319 4 47 37.3 81. 11.3 A0319 4 48 39.7 60. 8.4 A0319 4 49 40.5 71. 8.0 A0319 4 50 ENDDATA 22 0 A0319 4 51 ENDSUBENT 50 0 A0319 499999 SUBENT A0319005 20231225 A105A0319 5 1 BIB 8 19 A0319 5 2 REACTION M(47-AG-107(HE3,4N)49-IN-106-M,,SIG) A0319 5 3 G(47-AG-107(HE3,4N)49-IN-106-G,,SIG) A0319 5 4 SAMPLE (47-AG-107,ENR=0.9854) The target stacks consisted up A0319 5 5 to three 7.87E-3 gr/cm2 thick 98.54% enriched A0319 5 6 107-Ag foils interspersed by aluminum catcher foil. A0319 5 7 The copper foil was added to the stack to enable a A0319 5 8 flux measurement via the monitor reaction. A0319 5 9 MONITOR (29-CU-65(HE3,2N)31-GA-66,,SIG) A0319 5 10 DECAY-MON (31-GA-66,9.3HR,DG,1039.5,0.3732) A0319 5 11 DECAY-DATA (49-IN-106-G,6.3MIN,DG,861.4,0.69, A0319 5 12 DG,998.8,0.32, A0319 5 13 DG,1010.4,0.17) A0319 5 14 (49-IN-106-M,5.3MIN,DG,1716.2,0.185) A0319 5 15 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty includes all sources A0319 5 16 mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 5 17 STATUS (DEP,A0319034) Average values for monitor cross sect. A0319 5 18 (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 2 A0319 5 19 HISTORY (20160130U) SD: STATUS added. BIB update. A0319 5 20 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 5 21 ENDBIB 19 0 A0319 5 22 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 5 23 DATA 5 4 A0319 5 24 EN DATA MERR-T MDATA GERR-T G A0319 5 25 MEV MB MB MB MB A0319 5 26 30.6 2.2 0.7 18. 8. A0319 5 27 33.6 3.1 2.2 57. 7. A0319 5 28 35.7 22. 36. 107. 24. A0319 5 29 39.0 20. 5. 144. 17. A0319 5 30 ENDDATA 6 0 A0319 5 31 ENDSUBENT 30 0 A0319 599999 SUBENT A0319006 20231225 A105A0319 6 1 BIB 9 19 A0319 6 2 REACTION (47-AG-107(HE3,A)47-AG-106-M,,SIG) A0319 6 3 SAMPLE (47-AG-107,ENR=0.9854) The target stacks consisted up A0319 6 4 to three 7.87E-3 gr/cm2 thick 98.54% enriched A0319 6 5 107-Ag foils interspersed by aluminum catcher foil. A0319 6 6 The copper foil was added to the stack to enable a A0319 6 7 flux measurement via the monitor reaction. A0319 6 8 MONITOR (29-CU-65(HE3,2N)31-GA-66,,SIG) A0319 6 9 DECAY-MON (31-GA-66,9.3HR,DG,1039.5,0.3732) A0319 6 10 DECAY-DATA (47-AG-106-M,8.3D,DG,450.8,0.31, A0319 6 11 DG,717.1,0.32, A0319 6 12 DG,748.2,0.23) A0319 6 13 COMMENT -By Authors: the intensity of the gamma-peaks of A0319 6 14 Ag-106-G is not sufficient for the evaluation. A0319 6 15 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~13.%) includes all A0319 6 16 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 6 17 STATUS (DEP,A0319034) Average values for monitor cross sect. A0319 6 18 (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 3 A0319 6 19 HISTORY (20160130U) SD: STATUS added. BIB update. A0319 6 20 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 6 21 ENDBIB 19 0 A0319 6 22 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 6 23 DATA 3 9 A0319 6 24 EN DATA ERR-T A0319 6 25 MEV MB MB A0319 6 26 13.1 0.6 0.08 A0319 6 27 16.5 1.0 0.15 A0319 6 28 21.1 1.7 0.2 A0319 6 29 23.6 1.8 0.2 A0319 6 30 26.6 2.3 0.3 A0319 6 31 29.6 2.7 0.3 A0319 6 32 33.1 5.5 0.7 A0319 6 33 38.0 9.2 1.2 A0319 6 34 39.7 17.5 2.0 A0319 6 35 ENDDATA 11 0 A0319 6 36 ENDSUBENT 35 0 A0319 699999 SUBENT A0319007 20231225 A105A0319 7 1 BIB 9 25 A0319 7 2 REACTION (47-AG-107(HE3,X)47-AG-105,,SIG) A0319 7 3 SAMPLE (47-AG-107,ENR=0.9854) The target stacks consisted up A0319 7 4 to three 7.87E-3 gr/cm2 thick 98.54% enriched A0319 7 5 107-Ag foils interspersed by aluminum catcher foil. A0319 7 6 The copper foil was added to the stack to enable a A0319 7 7 flux measurement via the monitor reaction. A0319 7 8 MONITOR (29-CU-65(HE3,2N)31-GA-66,,SIG) A0319 7 9 DECAY-MON (31-GA-66,9.3HR,DG,1039.5,0.3732) A0319 7 10 DECAY-DATA (47-AG-105-G,41.2D,DG,280.4,0.32, A0319 7 11 DG,344.4,0.42, A0319 7 12 DG,443.3,0.10) A0319 7 13 (47-AG-105-M,7.2MIN) 99.66% Isomeric Transition. A0319 7 14 COMMENT - By Authors: Measurement performed after the decay ofA0319 7 15 the metastable state (T1/2=7.2 m). The metastable stateA0319 7 16 having no intensive gamma-rays was not measured. A0319 7 17 The cross sections calculated are the sum of the cross A0319 7 18 sections of both states. A0319 7 19 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~12.%) includes all A0319 7 20 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 7 21 STATUS (DEP,A0319034) Average values for monitor cross sect. A0319 7 22 (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 3 A0319 7 23 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: STATUS added. BIB update. SF3=N+A -> X;A0319 7 24 SF4=Ag-105g -> Ag-105; SF5=M+ deleted in REACTION code A0319 7 25 (see COMMENT). A0319 7 26 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 7 27 ENDBIB 25 0 A0319 7 28 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 7 29 DATA 3 10 A0319 7 30 EN DATA ERR-T A0319 7 31 MEV MB MB A0319 7 32 14.4 5.1 0.6 A0319 7 33 16.5 14.7 1.8 A0319 7 34 18.5 23.6 2.8 A0319 7 35 21.1 28.9 3.5 A0319 7 36 23.6 26.4 3.2 A0319 7 37 26.6 28.6 3.4 A0319 7 38 29.6 19.9 2.4 A0319 7 39 33.1 18.2 2.2 A0319 7 40 38.0 15.9 1.9 A0319 7 41 39.7 24.5 2.7 A0319 7 42 ENDDATA 12 0 A0319 7 43 ENDSUBENT 42 0 A0319 799999 SUBENT A0319008 20231225 A105A0319 8 1 BIB 9 21 A0319 8 2 REACTION G(47-AG-107(HE3,X)47-AG-104-G,,SIG) A0319 8 3 M(47-AG-107(HE3,X)47-AG-104-M,,SIG) A0319 8 4 SAMPLE (47-AG-107,ENR=0.9854) The target stacks consisted up A0319 8 5 to three 7.87E-3 gr/cm2 thick 98.54% enriched A0319 8 6 107-Ag foils interspersed by aluminum catcher foil. A0319 8 7 The copper foil was added to the stack to enable a A0319 8 8 flux measurement via the monitor reaction. A0319 8 9 MONITOR (29-CU-65(HE3,2N)31-GA-66,,SIG) A0319 8 10 DECAY-MON (31-GA-66,9.3HR,DG,1039.5,0.3732) A0319 8 11 DECAY-DATA (47-AG-104-M,33.5MIN,EC,,0.33) A0319 8 12 (47-AG-104-G,69.2MIN,DG,767.4,0.663) A0319 8 13 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~13.% for Ag-104g and A0319 8 14 ~25.% for Ag-104m) includes all sources mentioned in A0319 8 15 ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 8 16 COMMENT -By Authors: the activities of Ag-104g and Ag-104m A0319 8 17 were calculated by means of the Bateman equation. A0319 8 18 STATUS (DEP,A0319034) Average values for monitor cross sect. A0319 8 19 (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 3 A0319 8 20 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: STATUS added. BIB update. A0319 8 21 SF3=2N+A -> X in REACTION code. A0319 8 22 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 8 23 ENDBIB 21 0 A0319 8 24 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 8 25 DATA 5 6 A0319 8 26 EN DATA GERR-T GDATA MERR-T M A0319 8 27 MEV MB MB MB MB A0319 8 28 21.1 1.9 0.2 A0319 8 29 27.6 16.4 2.1 8. 2.0 A0319 8 30 30.6 25.0 3.2 23. 4. A0319 8 31 33.6 29.7 3.9 24. 6.0 A0319 8 32 35.7 36.8 4.8 14. 3.5 A0319 8 33 39.7 22.0 2.7 15. 5. A0319 8 34 ENDDATA 8 0 A0319 8 35 ENDSUBENT 34 0 A0319 899999 SUBENT A0319009 20231225 A105A0319 9 1 BIB 9 23 A0319 9 2 REACTION (47-AG-107(HE3,X)47-AG-103,,SIG) A0319 9 3 SAMPLE (47-AG-107,ENR=0.9854) The target stacks consisted up A0319 9 4 to three 7.87E-3 gr/cm2 thick 98.54% enriched A0319 9 5 107-Ag foils interspersed by aluminum catcher foil. A0319 9 6 The copper foil was added to the stack to enable a A0319 9 7 flux measurement via the monitor reaction. A0319 9 8 MONITOR (29-CU-65(HE3,2N)31-GA-66,,SIG) A0319 9 9 DECAY-MON (31-GA-66,9.3HR,DG,1039.5,0.3732) A0319 9 10 DECAY-DATA (47-AG-103-G,1.1HR,DG,118.7,0.222, A0319 9 11 DG,148.5,0.201) A0319 9 12 (47-AG-103-M,5.7SEC) 100% Isomeric Transition. A0319 9 13 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~14.%) includes all A0319 9 14 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 9 15 COMMENT - By Authors: Measurement performed after the decay ofA0319 9 16 the metastable state (TI/2=5.7s). The cross sections A0319 9 17 calculated are the sum of the cross sections of A0319 9 18 both isomeric states. A0319 9 19 STATUS (DEP,A0319034) Average values for monitor cross sect. A0319 9 20 (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 3 A0319 9 21 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: STATUS added. BIB update. SF3=3N+A -> XA0319 9 22 SF4=Ag-103g -> Ag-103; SF5=M+ deleted in REACTION code A0319 9 23 (see COMMENT). A0319 9 24 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 9 25 ENDBIB 23 0 A0319 9 26 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 9 27 DATA 3 9 A0319 9 28 EN DATA ERR-T A0319 9 29 MEV MB MB A0319 9 30 32.2 4.0 0.6 A0319 9 31 33.1 7.5 1.1 A0319 9 32 33.6 8.5 1.3 A0319 9 33 34.3 8.0 1.1 A0319 9 34 35.7 21.4 3.0 A0319 9 35 36.4 22.9 3.2 A0319 9 36 37.3 26.8 3.8 A0319 9 37 38.0 47.3 6.6 A0319 9 38 39.7 49.6 6.1 A0319 9 39 ENDDATA 11 0 A0319 9 40 ENDSUBENT 39 0 A0319 999999 SUBENT A0319010 20231225 A105A0319 10 1 BIB 9 20 A0319 10 2 REACTION (47-AG-107(HE3,X)48-CD-107,,SIG) A0319 10 3 SAMPLE (47-AG-107,ENR=0.9854) The target stacks consisted up A0319 10 4 to three 7.87E-3 gr/cm2 thick 98.54% enriched A0319 10 5 107-Ag foils interspersed by aluminum catcher foil. A0319 10 6 The copper foil was added to the stack to enable a A0319 10 7 flux measurement via the monitor reaction. A0319 10 8 MONITOR (29-CU-65(HE3,2N)31-GA-66,,SIG) A0319 10 9 DECAY-MON (31-GA-66,9.3HR,DG,1039.5,0.3732) A0319 10 10 DECAY-DATA (48-CD-107,6.5HR,DG,93.1,0.046) A0319 10 11 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~21.%) includes all A0319 10 12 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 10 13 COMMENT - By Authors: Measured by means of the isomeric A0319 10 14 transition Ag-107m to Ag-107g after establishment A0319 10 15 of the equilibrium. A0319 10 16 STATUS (DEP,A0319034) Average values for monitor cross sect. A0319 10 17 (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 3 A0319 10 18 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: STATUS added. BIB update. SF3=2N+P -> XA0319 10 19 in REACTION code. A0319 10 20 (20200201A) SD: SF5=IND deleted from REACTION code. A0319 10 21 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 10 22 ENDBIB 20 0 A0319 10 23 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 10 24 DATA 3 22 A0319 10 25 EN DATA ERR-T A0319 10 26 MEV MB MB A0319 10 27 12.3 1.7 0.3 A0319 10 28 15.3 8.3 1.7 A0319 10 29 18.0 26. 7. A0319 10 30 19.5 93. 19.5 A0319 10 31 19.7 141. 21.5 A0319 10 32 21.5 134. 28.1 A0319 10 33 23.0 276. 58.0 A0319 10 34 23.1 211. 44.3 A0319 10 35 23.6 332. 75. A0319 10 36 26.2 310. 65.1 A0319 10 37 27.6 331. 69.5 A0319 10 38 28.6 450. 94.5 A0319 10 39 30.6 413. 86.7 A0319 10 40 32.2 492. 99. A0319 10 41 33.1 367. 77.1 A0319 10 42 33.6 420. 88.2 A0319 10 43 34.3 329. 69.1 A0319 10 44 35.7 376. 79.0 A0319 10 45 36.4 313. 65.7 A0319 10 46 37.3 324. 68.0 A0319 10 47 38.0 287. 60.3 A0319 10 48 39.7 306. 52. A0319 10 49 ENDDATA 24 0 A0319 10 50 ENDSUBENT 49 0 A0319 1099999 SUBENT A0319011 20231225 A105A0319 11 1 BIB 7 22 A0319 11 2 REACTION M(47-AG-107(A,N)49-IN-110-M,,SIG) A0319 11 3 G(47-AG-107(A,N)49-IN-110-G,,SIG) A0319 11 4 METHOD (BCINT) A0319 11 5 SAMPLE (47-AG-107,ENR=0.9854) The target stacks consisted up A0319 11 6 to three 7.87E-3 gr/cm2 thick 98.54% enriched A0319 11 7 107-Ag foils interspersed by aluminum catcher foil. A0319 11 8 The copper foil was added to the stack to enable a A0319 11 9 flux measurement via the monitor reaction. A0319 11 10 DECAY-DATA (49-IN-110-M,69.1MIN,DG,657.7,0.979) A0319 11 11 The contribution of the In-110m to this peak was A0319 11 12 subtracted. A0319 11 13 (49-IN-110-G,4.9HR,DG,657.7,0.989, A0319 11 14 DG,707.4,0.312, A0319 11 15 DG,884.6,0.950, A0319 11 16 DG,937.5,0.697) A0319 11 17 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~23.% for In-110m and A0319 11 18 ~17.% for In-110g) includes all sources mentioned in A0319 11 19 ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 11 20 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 5 A0319 11 21 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: In-110g and In-110m were swapped A0319 11 22 following their half-lives. STATUS added. BIB update. A0319 11 23 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 11 24 ENDBIB 22 0 A0319 11 25 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 11 26 DATA 5 6 A0319 11 27 EN DATA MERR-T MDATA GERR-T G A0319 11 28 MEV MB MB MB MB A0319 11 29 13.2 26. 6.0 50. 8.5 A0319 11 30 20.1 51. 11.7 111. 18.9 A0319 11 31 25.5 5.2 0.7 24. 3. A0319 11 32 33.6 3.1 1. 19. 4. A0319 11 33 37.6 2.9 0.7 23. 3.9 A0319 11 34 41.6 3. 0.7 19. 4. A0319 11 35 ENDDATA 8 0 A0319 11 36 ENDSUBENT 35 0 A0319 1199999 SUBENT A0319012 20231225 A105A0319 12 1 BIB 8 16 A0319 12 2 REACTION (47-AG-107(A,2N)49-IN-109,,SIG) A0319 12 3 METHOD (BCINT) A0319 12 4 SAMPLE (47-AG-107,ENR=0.9854) The target stacks consisted up A0319 12 5 to three 7.87E-3 gr/cm2 thick 98.54% enriched A0319 12 6 107-Ag foils interspersed by aluminum catcher foil. A0319 12 7 DECAY-DATA (49-IN-109-G,4.2HR,DG,204.,0.68) A0319 12 8 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~11.%) includes all A0319 12 9 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 12 10 COMMENT -By Authors: Measurement performed after the decay of A0319 12 11 the metastable state. The cross sections calculated areA0319 12 12 the sum of the cross sections of both isomeric states. A0319 12 13 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 5 A0319 12 14 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: STATUS added. BIB update. A0319 12 15 SF4=In-109g -> In-109; SF5=M+ deleted in REACTION code A0319 12 16 (see COMMENT). A0319 12 17 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 12 18 ENDBIB 16 0 A0319 12 19 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 12 20 DATA 3 18 A0319 12 21 EN DATA ERR-T A0319 12 22 MEV MB MB A0319 12 23 13.2 6.7 0.7 A0319 12 24 20.1 519. 57.1 A0319 12 25 25.5 1012. 111.3 A0319 12 26 31.9 710. 78.1 A0319 12 27 33.6 546. 58. A0319 12 28 36.7 294. 32.3 A0319 12 29 37.6 207. 22.8 A0319 12 30 41.6 134. 14.7 A0319 12 31 45.7 64. 7.0 A0319 12 32 54.7 43. 5. A0319 12 33 59.7 30. 3.3 A0319 12 34 64.7 25. 2.8 A0319 12 35 68.7 15. 1.7 A0319 12 36 72.7 15. 1.5 A0319 12 37 77.8 11.6 1.3 A0319 12 38 86.8 8.9 1.0 A0319 12 39 91.8 5. 0.6 A0319 12 40 96.8 6.6 0.7 A0319 12 41 ENDDATA 20 0 A0319 12 42 ENDSUBENT 41 0 A0319 1299999 SUBENT A0319013 20231225 A105A0319 13 1 BIB 8 21 A0319 13 2 REACTION G(47-AG-107(A,3N)49-IN-108-M,,SIG) A0319 13 3 M(47-AG-107(A,3N)49-IN-108-G,,SIG) A0319 13 4 METHOD (BCINT) A0319 13 5 SAMPLE (47-AG-107,ENR=0.9854) The target stacks consisted up A0319 13 6 to three 7.87E-3 gr/cm2 thick 98.54% enriched A0319 13 7 107-Ag foils interspersed by aluminum catcher foil. A0319 13 8 DECAY-DATA (49-IN-108-M,40.MIN,DG,633.2,0.764) A0319 13 9 (49-IN-108-G,58.MIN,DG,387.6,0.13, A0319 13 10 DG,633.2,1., A0319 13 11 DG,876.0,0.85, A0319 13 12 DG,1032.3,0.20, A0319 13 13 DG,1056.3,0.25) A0319 13 14 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~16.% for Ag-108g and A0319 13 15 ~13.% for Ag-108m) includes all sources mentioned in A0319 13 16 ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 13 17 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 5 A0319 13 18 COMMENT - By Authors: measurement performed after the decay A0319 13 19 of 106-In. A0319 13 20 HISTORY (20160130U) SD: STATUS added. BIB update. A0319 13 21 (20231225A) SD: In-108-M and In-108-G were swapped A0319 13 22 in REACTION codes and DECAY-DATA. STATUS updated. A0319 13 23 ENDBIB 21 0 A0319 13 24 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 13 25 DATA 5 15 A0319 13 26 EN DATA GERR-T GDATA MERR-T M A0319 13 27 MEV MB MB MB MB A0319 13 28 31.9 86. 13.8 296. 38.5 A0319 13 29 33.6 82. 13.1 382. 49.7 A0319 13 30 36.7 173. 27.7 453. 58.9 A0319 13 31 37.6 539. 56. A0319 13 32 40.8 668. 86.8 A0319 13 33 41.6 186. 38. 674. 74. A0319 13 34 45.3 459. 59.7 A0319 13 35 54.7 126. 14. A0319 13 36 59.7 82. 10.7 A0319 13 37 64.7 66. 8.6 A0319 13 38 68.7 44. 5.7 A0319 13 39 72.7 45. 6. A0319 13 40 77.8 34. 4.4 A0319 13 41 86.8 27. 3.5 A0319 13 42 91.8 14. 2. A0319 13 43 ENDDATA 17 0 A0319 13 44 ENDSUBENT 43 0 A0319 1399999 SUBENT A0319014 20231225 A105A0319 14 1 BIB 8 22 A0319 14 2 REACTION (47-AG-107(A,4N)49-IN-107,,SIG) A0319 14 3 METHOD (BCINT) A0319 14 4 SAMPLE (47-AG-107,ENR=0.9854) The target stacks consisted up A0319 14 5 to three 7.87E-3 gr/cm2 thick 98.54% enriched A0319 14 6 107-Ag foils interspersed by aluminum catcher foil. A0319 14 7 The copper foil was added to the stack to enable a A0319 14 8 flux measurement via the monitor reaction. A0319 14 9 DECAY-DATA (49-IN-107-G,32.4MIN,DG,205.,0.485) A0319 14 10 The contribution of 109-In to this peak is subtracted. A0319 14 11 (49-IN-107-M,52.SEC) 100% isomeric transition. A0319 14 12 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~15.%) includes all A0319 14 13 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 14 14 COMMENT By authors: Measurement performed after decay of the A0319 14 15 metastable state (T1/2=52s). The cross sections A0319 14 16 calculated are the sum of the cross sections of both A0319 14 17 isomeric states. The contribution of 109In to this peakA0319 14 18 is subtracted. A0319 14 19 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 5 A0319 14 20 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: STATUS added. BIB update. A0319 14 21 SF4=In-107g -> In-107; SF5=M+ deleted in REACTION code A0319 14 22 (see COMMENT). A0319 14 23 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 14 24 ENDBIB 22 0 A0319 14 25 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 14 26 DATA 3 17 A0319 14 27 EN DATA ERR-T A0319 14 28 MEV MB MB A0319 14 29 36.7 10.3 1.5 A0319 14 30 37.6 8.8 1.8 A0319 14 31 40.8 12.2 1.8 A0319 14 32 41.6 39. 8. A0319 14 33 45.3 187. 28.1 A0319 14 34 49.5 315. 47.3 A0319 14 35 54.0 353. 52.9 A0319 14 36 54.7 273. 32. A0319 14 37 57.6 296. 44.4 A0319 14 38 59.7 203. 30.5 A0319 14 39 64.7 139. 20.8 A0319 14 40 68.7 84. 12.6 A0319 14 41 72.7 80. 10. A0319 14 42 77.8 58. 9. A0319 14 43 86.8 44. 6.6 A0319 14 44 91.8 24. 2.5 A0319 14 45 96.8 36. 5.4 A0319 14 46 ENDDATA 19 0 A0319 14 47 ENDSUBENT 46 0 A0319 1499999 SUBENT A0319015 20231225 A105A0319 15 1 BIB 7 15 A0319 15 2 REACTION (47-AG-107(A,5N)49-IN-106-M,,SIG) A0319 15 3 METHOD (BCINT) A0319 15 4 SAMPLE (47-AG-107,ENR=0.9854) The target stacks consisted up A0319 15 5 to three 7.87E-3 gr/cm2 thick 98.54% enriched A0319 15 6 107-Ag foils interspersed by aluminum catcher foil. A0319 15 7 The copper foil was added to the stack to enable a A0319 15 8 flux measurement via the monitor reaction. A0319 15 9 DECAY-DATA (49-IN-106-M,6.3MIN,DG,861.4,0.69, A0319 15 10 DG,998.8,0.32, A0319 15 11 DG,1010.4,0.17) A0319 15 12 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~17.%) includes all A0319 15 13 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 15 14 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 5 A0319 15 15 HISTORY (20160130U) SD: STATUS added. BIB update. A0319 15 16 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 15 17 ENDBIB 15 0 A0319 15 18 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 15 19 DATA 3 11 A0319 15 20 EN DATA ERR-T A0319 15 21 MEV MB MB A0319 15 22 54.0 50. 8.5 A0319 15 23 57.6 69. 10. A0319 15 24 61.0 109. 18.5 A0319 15 25 64.6 138. 23.5 A0319 15 26 69.4 145. 24.7 A0319 15 27 74.6 118. 18. A0319 15 28 77.3 96. 16.3 A0319 15 29 77.8 83. 14.1 A0319 15 30 86.8 51. 3. A0319 15 31 91.8 28. 8. A0319 15 32 96.8 34. 5.8 A0319 15 33 ENDDATA 13 0 A0319 15 34 ENDSUBENT 33 0 A0319 1599999 SUBENT A0319016 20231225 A105A0319 16 1 BIB 8 18 A0319 16 2 REACTION (47-AG-107(A,X)48-CD-107,,SIG) A0319 16 3 METHOD (BCINT) A0319 16 4 SAMPLE (47-AG-107,ENR=0.9854) The target stacks consisted up A0319 16 5 to three 7.87E-3 gr/cm2 thick 98.54% enriched A0319 16 6 107-Ag foils interspersed by aluminum catcher foil. A0319 16 7 The copper foil was added to the stack to enable a A0319 16 8 flux measurement via the monitor reaction. A0319 16 9 DECAY-DATA (48-CD-107,6.5HR,DG,93.1,0.046) A0319 16 10 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~20.%) includes all A0319 16 11 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 16 12 COMMENT - By Authors: Measured by means of the isomeric A0319 16 13 transition Ag-107m to Ag-107g after establishment A0319 16 14 of the equilibrium. A0319 16 15 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 6 A0319 16 16 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: STATUS added. BIB update. SF3=3N+P -> XA0319 16 17 in REACTION code. A0319 16 18 (20200201A) SD: SF5=IND deleted from REACTION code. A0319 16 19 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 16 20 ENDBIB 18 0 A0319 16 21 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 16 22 DATA 3 11 A0319 16 23 EN DATA ERR-T A0319 16 24 MEV MB MB A0319 16 25 45.5 145. 29.0 A0319 16 26 49.5 353. 70.6 A0319 16 27 54.0 439. 87.8 A0319 16 28 54.7 530. 114. A0319 16 29 59.7 456. 91.2 A0319 16 30 64.7 369. 73.8 A0319 16 31 68.7 228. 45.6 A0319 16 32 72.7 236. 43. A0319 16 33 77.8 220. 44. A0319 16 34 86.8 176. 35.2 A0319 16 35 91.8 159. 31.8 A0319 16 36 ENDDATA 13 0 A0319 16 37 ENDSUBENT 36 0 A0319 1699999 SUBENT A0319017 20231225 A105A0319 17 1 BIB 8 24 A0319 17 2 REACTION G(47-AG-107(A,X)47-AG-104-G,,SIG) A0319 17 3 M(47-AG-107(A,X)47-AG-104-M,,SIG) A0319 17 4 METHOD (BCINT) A0319 17 5 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T,30.) Only a rough lower limit estimation A0319 17 6 of the error is given. The uncertainty due to the A0319 17 7 analysis of the gamma-spectra differs from case to caseA0319 17 8 Much greater uncertainties were taken into account in A0319 17 9 those cases where complex peak evaluation and A0319 17 10 subtraction of activities could not be avoided during A0319 17 11 the calculation of the cross sections. A0319 17 12 SAMPLE (47-AG-107,ENR=0.9854) The target stacks consisted up A0319 17 13 to three 7.87E-3 gr/cm2 thick 98.54% enriched A0319 17 14 107-Ag foils interspersed by aluminum catcher foil. A0319 17 15 The copper foil was added to the stack to enable a A0319 17 16 flux measurement via the monitor reaction. A0319 17 17 DECAY-DATA (47-AG-104-G,69.2MIN,DG,767.4,0.663) A0319 17 18 (47-AG-104-M,33.5MIN,EC,,0.33) A0319 17 19 COMMENT - By Authors: the activities of Ag-104-G and Ag-104-M A0319 17 20 were calculated by means of the Bateman equation. A0319 17 21 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 6 A0319 17 22 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: STATUS added. BIB update. SF3=3N+A -> XA0319 17 23 in REACTION code. A0319 17 24 (20200201U) SD: Small correction in ERR-ANALYS. A0319 17 25 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 17 26 ENDBIB 24 0 A0319 17 27 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 17 28 DATA 3 8 A0319 17 29 EN DATA GDATA M A0319 17 30 MEV MB MB A0319 17 31 49.5 33. 20. A0319 17 32 54.0 84. 21. A0319 17 33 54.7 75. 58. A0319 17 34 57.6 93. 35. A0319 17 35 61.0 94. 44. A0319 17 36 64.6 76. 44. A0319 17 37 69.4 72. 31. A0319 17 38 72.7 46. 14. A0319 17 39 ENDDATA 10 0 A0319 17 40 ENDSUBENT 39 0 A0319 1799999 SUBENT A0319018 20231225 A105A0319 18 1 BIB 8 20 A0319 18 2 REACTION (47-AG-107(A,X)47-AG-103,,SIG) A0319 18 3 METHOD (BCINT) A0319 18 4 SAMPLE (47-AG-107,ENR=0.9854) The target stacks consisted up A0319 18 5 to three 7.87E-3 gr/cm2 thick 98.54% enriched A0319 18 6 107-Ag foils interspersed by aluminum catcher foil. A0319 18 7 The copper foil was added to the stack to enable a A0319 18 8 flux measurement via the monitor reaction. A0319 18 9 DECAY-DATA (47-AG-103-G,1.1HR,DG,118.7,0.222, A0319 18 10 DG,148.5,0.201) A0319 18 11 (47-AG-103-M,5.7SEC) 100% Isomeric Transition. A0319 18 12 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~16.%) includes all A0319 18 13 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 18 14 COMMENT -By Authors: Measurement performed after the decay of A0319 18 15 the metastable state. The cross sections calculated areA0319 18 16 the sum of the cross sections of both isomeric states. A0319 18 17 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 6 A0319 18 18 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: STATUS added. BIB update. SF3=4N+A -> XA0319 18 19 SF4=Ag-103g -> Ag-103; SF5=M+ deleted in REACTION code A0319 18 20 (see COMMENT). A0319 18 21 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 18 22 ENDBIB 20 0 A0319 18 23 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 18 24 DATA 3 18 A0319 18 25 EN DATA ERR-T A0319 18 26 MEV MB MB A0319 18 27 59.7 29. 4.6 A0319 18 28 61.0 56. 9.0 A0319 18 29 64.0 87. 13.9 A0319 18 30 64.7 87. 16. A0319 18 31 68.0 111. 17.8 A0319 18 32 68.7 97. 15.5 A0319 18 33 69.4 119. 19.0 A0319 18 34 72.1 127. 20.3 A0319 18 35 72.7 130. 20.8 A0319 18 36 74.6 124. 15. A0319 18 37 77.3 144. 23.0 A0319 18 38 77.8 118. 18.9 A0319 18 39 80.0 94. 15.0 A0319 18 40 84.7 84. 14. A0319 18 41 86.2 123. 19.7 A0319 18 42 86.8 92. 14.7 A0319 18 43 91.8 53. 9. A0319 18 44 96.8 110. 17.6 A0319 18 45 ENDDATA 20 0 A0319 18 46 ENDSUBENT 45 0 A0319 1899999 SUBENT A0319019 20231225 A105A0319 19 1 BIB 8 17 A0319 19 2 REACTION (47-AG-107(A,X)47-AG-102-G,(CUM),SIG) A0319 19 3 METHOD (BCINT) A0319 19 4 SAMPLE (47-AG-107,ENR=0.9854) The target stacks consisted up A0319 19 5 to three 7.87E-3 gr/cm2 thick 98.54% enriched A0319 19 6 107-Ag foils interspersed by aluminum catcher foil. A0319 19 7 The copper foil was added to the stack to enable a A0319 19 8 flux measurement via the monitor reaction. A0319 19 9 DECAY-DATA (47-AG-102-G,13.MIN,DG,719.,0.581) A0319 19 10 (47-AG-102-M,7.7MIN) 49% Isomeric Transition. A0319 19 11 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~16.%) includes all A0319 19 12 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 19 13 COMMENT - By Compiler: the method for excluding possible A0319 19 14 production Ag-102g via decay Ag-102m and/or Cd-102 is A0319 19 15 not described by authors. A0319 19 16 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 6 A0319 19 17 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: STATUS added. BIB update. A0319 19 18 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 19 19 ENDBIB 17 0 A0319 19 20 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 19 21 DATA 3 11 A0319 19 22 EN DATA ERR-T A0319 19 23 MEV MB MB A0319 19 24 74.6 15. 2.4 A0319 19 25 77.3 32. 5. A0319 19 26 77.8 30. 4.8 A0319 19 27 80.0 34. 5.4 A0319 19 28 84.7 42. 7. A0319 19 29 86.2 53. 8.5 A0319 19 30 86.8 59. 9.4 A0319 19 31 89.1 40. 6. A0319 19 32 91.8 35. 5.6 A0319 19 33 96.3 64. 10.2 A0319 19 34 96.8 50. 7. A0319 19 35 ENDDATA 13 0 A0319 19 36 ENDSUBENT 35 0 A0319 1999999 SUBENT A0319020 20231225 A105A0319 20 1 BIB 9 20 A0319 20 2 REACTION (47-AG-109(HE3,N)49-IN-111,,SIG) A0319 20 3 SAMPLE The target stacks consisted up to three 12.E-3 gr/cm2 A0319 20 4 thick natural silver (99.99% pure). A0319 20 5 MONITOR (29-CU-65(HE3,2N)31-GA-66,,SIG) A0319 20 6 DECAY-MON (31-GA-66,9.3HR,DG,1039.5,0.3732) A0319 20 7 DECAY-DATA (49-IN-111-G,2.83D,DG,171.3,0.903, A0319 20 8 DG,245.3,0.94) A0319 20 9 (49-IN-111-M,7.6MIN) 100% Isomeric Transition A0319 20 10 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~13.%) includes all A0319 20 11 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 20 12 COMMENT -By Authors: Measurement performed after the decay of A0319 20 13 the metastable state. The cross sections calculated areA0319 20 14 the sum of the cross sections of both isomeric states. A0319 20 15 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 4 A0319 20 16 (DEP,A0319034) Average values for monitor cross sect. A0319 20 17 (also see ANALYSIS in Subent 001). A0319 20 18 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: STATUS added. BIB update. A0319 20 19 SF4=In-111g -> In-111; SF5=M+ deleted in REACTION code A0319 20 20 (see COMMENT). A0319 20 21 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 20 22 ENDBIB 20 0 A0319 20 23 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 20 24 DATA 3 11 A0319 20 25 EN DATA ERR-T A0319 20 26 MEV MB MB A0319 20 27 10.0 0.07 9.E-03 A0319 20 28 14.2 1.2 0.1 A0319 20 29 14.8 1.0 0.1 A0319 20 30 18.0 2.4 0.3 A0319 20 31 20.3 2.2 0.3 A0319 20 32 23.7 2.2 0.3 A0319 20 33 26.5 2.0 0.3 A0319 20 34 29.0 1.8 0.2 A0319 20 35 29.7 2.0 0.2 A0319 20 36 34.3 1.8 0.2 A0319 20 37 39.6 1.5 0.2 A0319 20 38 ENDDATA 13 0 A0319 20 39 ENDSUBENT 38 0 A0319 2099999 SUBENT A0319021 20231225 A105A0319 21 1 BIB 9 24 A0319 21 2 REACTION G(47-AG-109(HE3,2N)49-IN-110-G,,SIG,,,DERIV) A0319 21 3 M(47-AG-109(HE3,2N)49-IN-110-M,,SIG,,,DERIV) A0319 21 4 ANALYSIS Derived from elemental cross section and 107Ag A0319 21 5 isotopic cross section. A0319 21 6 SAMPLE The target stacks consisted up to three 12.E-3 gr/cm2 A0319 21 7 thick natural silver (99.99% pure). A0319 21 8 MONITOR (29-CU-65(HE3,2N)31-GA-66,,SIG) A0319 21 9 DECAY-MON (31-GA-66,9.3HR,DG,1039.5,0.3732) A0319 21 10 DECAY-DATA (49-IN-110-G,4.9HR,DG,657.7,0.988, A0319 21 11 DG,707.4,0.312, A0319 21 12 DG,884.6,0.95, A0319 21 13 DG,937.5,0.697) A0319 21 14 (49-IN-110-M,69.1MIN,DG,657.7,0.979) A0319 21 15 The contribution of the In-110m to this peak was A0319 21 16 subtracted. A0319 21 17 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~12.%) includes all A0319 21 18 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 21 19 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 4 A0319 21 20 (DEP,A0319034) Average values for monitor cross sect. A0319 21 21 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: In-110g and In-110m were swapped A0319 21 22 following their half-lives. STATUS added. BIB updated. A0319 21 23 (20200401A) SD: SF8=A deleted, SF9=DERIV added in A0319 21 24 REACTION code. ANALYSIS added. A0319 21 25 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 21 26 ENDBIB 24 0 A0319 21 27 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 21 28 DATA 5 13 A0319 21 29 EN DATA MERR-T MDATA GERR-T G A0319 21 30 MEV MB MB MB MB A0319 21 31 12.3 1.6 0.2 0.8 0.1 A0319 21 32 15.3 35.8 4.3 17.2 2.1 A0319 21 33 18.0 36.3 4.5 30.0 3.4 A0319 21 34 19.7 24.0 2.9 34.0 4.1 A0319 21 35 23.0 11.3 1.4 21.8 2.6 A0319 21 36 23.1 11.6 1.4 23.4 2.8 A0319 21 37 26.2 7.6 0.9 14.1 1.7 A0319 21 38 28.6 7.6 0.9 12.2 1.2 A0319 21 39 32.2 5.1 0.6 8.4 1.0 A0319 21 40 33.1 4.8 0.6 6.5 0.8 A0319 21 41 36.4 4.2 0.5 5.3 0.6 A0319 21 42 37.3 3.5 0.4 4.7 0.6 A0319 21 43 40.5 3.3 0.4 4.4 0.6 A0319 21 44 ENDDATA 15 0 A0319 21 45 ENDSUBENT 44 0 A0319 2199999 SUBENT A0319022 20231225 A105A0319 22 1 BIB 10 24 A0319 22 2 REACTION (47-AG-109(HE3,3N)49-IN-109,,SIG,,,DERIV) A0319 22 3 ANALYSIS Derived from elemental cross section and 107Ag A0319 22 4 isotopic cross section. A0319 22 5 SAMPLE The target stacks consisted up to three 12.E-3 gr/cm2 A0319 22 6 thick natural silver (99.99% pure). A0319 22 7 MONITOR (29-CU-65(HE3,2N)31-GA-66,,SIG) A0319 22 8 DECAY-MON (31-GA-66,9.3HR,DG,1039.5,0.3732) A0319 22 9 DECAY-DATA (49-IN-109-G,4.2HR,DG,204.,0.68) A0319 22 10 The contribution of In-107 to this peak is subtracted. A0319 22 11 (49-IN-109-M1,1.34MIN) A0319 22 12 COMMENT -By Authors: Measurement performed after the decay of A0319 22 13 the metastable state. The cross sections calculated areA0319 22 14 the sum of the cross sections of both isomeric states. A0319 22 15 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~13.%) includes all A0319 22 16 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 22 17 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 4 A0319 22 18 (DEP,A0319034) Average values for monitor cross sect. A0319 22 19 (also see ANALYSIS in Subent 001). A0319 22 20 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: STATUS added. BIB updated. A0319 22 21 SF4=In-109g -> In-109; SF5=M+ deleted from REACTION A0319 22 22 code (see COMMENT). A0319 22 23 (20200401A) SD: SF8=A deleted, SF9=DERIV added in A0319 22 24 REACTION code. ANALYSIS added. A0319 22 25 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 22 26 ENDBIB 24 0 A0319 22 27 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 22 28 DATA 3 13 A0319 22 29 EN DATA ERR-T A0319 22 30 MEV MB MB A0319 22 31 15.3 18. 2.3 A0319 22 32 18.0 72. 12. A0319 22 33 19.7 210. 27.3 A0319 22 34 23.0 294. 38.2 A0319 22 35 23.1 260. 33.8 A0319 22 36 26.2 325. 39. A0319 22 37 28.6 464. 60.3 A0319 22 38 32.2 322. 41.9 A0319 22 39 33.1 206. 26.8 A0319 22 40 34.3 180. 21. A0319 22 41 36.4 126. 16.4 A0319 22 42 37.3 95. 12.4 A0319 22 43 40.5 66. 8. A0319 22 44 ENDDATA 15 0 A0319 22 45 ENDSUBENT 44 0 A0319 2299999 SUBENT A0319023 20231225 A105A0319 23 1 BIB 10 27 A0319 23 2 REACTION M(47-AG-109(HE3,4N)49-IN-108-M,,SIG,,,DERIV) A0319 23 3 G(47-AG-109(HE3,4N)49-IN-108-G,,SIG,,,DERIV) A0319 23 4 ANALYSIS Derived from elemental cross section and 107Ag A0319 23 5 isotopic cross section. A0319 23 6 SAMPLE The target stacks consisted up to three 12.E-3 gr/cm2 A0319 23 7 thick natural silver (99.99% pure). A0319 23 8 MONITOR (29-CU-65(HE3,2N)31-GA-66,,SIG) A0319 23 9 DECAY-MON (31-GA-66,9.3HR,DG,1039.5,0.3732) A0319 23 10 DECAY-DATA (49-IN-108-M,40.MIN,DG,633.2,0.764) A0319 23 11 (49-IN-108-G,58.MIN,DG,387.6,0.13, A0319 23 12 DG,633.2,1., A0319 23 13 DG,876.,0.85, A0319 23 14 DG,1032.3,0.2, A0319 23 15 DG,1056.3,0.25) A0319 23 16 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~26.% for In-108g and A0319 23 17 ~16.% for In-108m) includes all sources mentioned in A0319 23 18 ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 23 19 COMMENT - By Authors: Measurement performed after the decay A0319 23 20 of 106-In. A0319 23 21 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 4 A0319 23 22 (DEP,A0319034) Average values for monitor cross sect. A0319 23 23 (also see ANALYSIS in Subent 001). A0319 23 24 HISTORY (20160130U) SD: STATUS added. BIB updated. A0319 23 25 (20200401A) SD: SF8=A deleted, SF9=DERIV added in A0319 23 26 REACTION code. ANALYSIS added. A0319 23 27 (20231225A) SD: In-108-M and In-108-G were swapped A0319 23 28 in REACTION codes and DECAY-DATA. STATUS updated. A0319 23 29 ENDBIB 27 0 A0319 23 30 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 23 31 DATA 5 8 A0319 23 32 EN DATA MERR-T MDATA GERR-T G A0319 23 33 MEV MB MB MB MB A0319 23 34 26.2 14. 3.6 7.5 1.2 A0319 23 35 28.6 40. 7. 32. 7. A0319 23 36 32.2 71. 12. 112. 14. A0319 23 37 33.1 114. 18.2 A0319 23 38 34.3 45. 11.7 127. 20.3 A0319 23 39 36.4 23. 6.0 149. 23.8 A0319 23 40 37.3 17.7 7. 159. 24. A0319 23 41 40.5 3.9 1.0 176. 28.2 A0319 23 42 ENDDATA 10 0 A0319 23 43 ENDSUBENT 42 0 A0319 2399999 SUBENT A0319024 20231225 A105A0319 24 1 BIB 9 19 A0319 24 2 REACTION (47-AG-109(HE3,2P)47-AG-110-M,,SIG,,,DERIV) A0319 24 3 ANALYSIS Derived from elemental cross section and 107Ag A0319 24 4 isotopic cross section. A0319 24 5 SAMPLE The target stacks consisted up to three 12.E-3 gr/cm2 A0319 24 6 thick natural silver (99.99% pure). A0319 24 7 MONITOR (29-CU-65(HE3,2N)31-GA-66,,SIG) A0319 24 8 DECAY-MON (31-GA-66,9.3HR,DG,1039.5,0.3732) A0319 24 9 DECAY-DATA (47-AG-110-M,250.4D,DG,657.7,0.938, A0319 24 10 DG,884.7,0.747, A0319 24 11 DG,937.5,0.332) A0319 24 12 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~12.%) includes all A0319 24 13 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 24 14 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 4 A0319 24 15 (DEP,A0319034) Average values for monitor cross sect. A0319 24 16 (also see ANALYSIS in Subent 001). A0319 24 17 HISTORY (20160130U) SD: STATUS added. BIB updated. A0319 24 18 (20200401A) SD: SF8=A deleted, SF9=DERIV added in A0319 24 19 REACTION code. ANALYSIS added. A0319 24 20 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 24 21 ENDBIB 19 0 A0319 24 22 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 24 23 DATA 3 9 A0319 24 24 EN DATA ERR-T A0319 24 25 MEV MB MB A0319 24 26 14.2 0.2 2.4E-02 A0319 24 27 18.0 1.7 0.2 A0319 24 28 20.3 2.5 0.3 A0319 24 29 23.7 4.7 0.6 A0319 24 30 26.5 6.0 0.7 A0319 24 31 29.0 6.7 0.8 A0319 24 32 29.7 8.6 1.0 A0319 24 33 34.3 9.2 1.1 A0319 24 34 39.6 9.2 1.1 A0319 24 35 ENDDATA 11 0 A0319 24 36 ENDSUBENT 35 0 A0319 2499999 SUBENT A0319025 20231225 A105A0319 25 1 BIB 10 21 A0319 25 2 REACTION (47-AG-109(HE3,X)47-AG-106-M,,SIG,,,DERIV) A0319 25 3 ANALYSIS Derived from elemental cross section and 107Ag A0319 25 4 isotopic cross section. A0319 25 5 SAMPLE The target stacks consisted up to three 12.E-3 gr/cm2 A0319 25 6 thick natural silver (99.99% pure). A0319 25 7 MONITOR (29-CU-65(HE3,2N)31-GA-66,,SIG) A0319 25 8 DECAY-MON (31-GA-66,9.3HR,DG,1039.5,0.3732) A0319 25 9 DECAY-DATA (47-AG-106-M,8.3D,DG,450.8,0.31, A0319 25 10 DG,717.1,0.32, A0319 25 11 DG,748.2,0.23) A0319 25 12 COMMENT /by Authors/ The intensity of the gamma-peaks of A0319 25 13 Ag-106g is not sufficient for the evaluation. A0319 25 14 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~18.%) includes all A0319 25 15 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 25 16 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 4 A0319 25 17 (DEP,A0319034) Average values for monitor cross sect. A0319 25 18 (also see ANALYSIS in Subent 001). A0319 25 19 HISTORY (20160130U) SD: STATUS added. BIB updated. A0319 25 20 (20200401A) SD: SF8=A deleted, SF9=DERIV added in A0319 25 21 REACTION code. ANALYSIS added. A0319 25 22 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 25 23 ENDBIB 21 0 A0319 25 24 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 25 25 DATA 3 8 A0319 25 26 EN DATA ERR-T A0319 25 27 MEV MB MB A0319 25 28 18.0 0.4 0.07 A0319 25 29 20.3 0.7 0.15 A0319 25 30 23.7 7.6 1.4 A0319 25 31 26.5 15.2 2.7 A0319 25 32 29.0 22.2 4.0 A0319 25 33 29.7 31.1 5.0 A0319 25 34 34.3 34.6 6.2 A0319 25 35 39.6 33.1 5.3 A0319 25 36 ENDDATA 10 0 A0319 25 37 ENDSUBENT 36 0 A0319 2599999 SUBENT A0319026 20231225 A105A0319 26 1 BIB 10 26 A0319 26 2 REACTION (47-AG-109(HE3,X)47-AG-105,,SIG,,,DERIV) A0319 26 3 SAMPLE The target stacks consisted up to three 12.E-3 gr/cm2 A0319 26 4 thick natural silver (99.99% pure). A0319 26 5 ANALYSIS Derived from elemental cross section A0319 26 6 and 107Ag isotopic cross section A0319 26 7 MONITOR (29-CU-65(HE3,2N)31-GA-66,,SIG) A0319 26 8 DECAY-MON (31-GA-66,9.3HR,DG,1039.5,0.3732) A0319 26 9 DECAY-DATA (47-AG-105-G,41.2D,DG,280.4,0.32, A0319 26 10 DG,344.4,0.42, A0319 26 11 DG,443.3,0.10) A0319 26 12 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~16.%) includes all A0319 26 13 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 26 14 COMMENT - By Authors: Measurement performed after the decay ofA0319 26 15 the metastable state (T1/2=7.2 m). The metastable stateA0319 26 16 having no intensive gamma-rays was not measured. A0319 26 17 The cross sections calculated are the sum of the cross A0319 26 18 sections of both states. A0319 26 19 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 4 A0319 26 20 (DEP,A0319034) Average values for monitor cross sect. A0319 26 21 (DEP,A0319007) 107Ag(He3,x)105Ag data A0319 26 22 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: STATUS added. BIB update. SF3=3N+A -> XA0319 26 23 SF4=Ag-105g -> Ag-105; SF5=M+ deleted from REACTION A0319 26 24 code (see COMMENT). A0319 26 25 (20200201A) SD: SF5=IND and SF8=A deleted; SF9=DERIV A0319 26 26 added to REACTION code. ANALYSIS added. STATUS updated.A0319 26 27 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 26 28 ENDBIB 26 0 A0319 26 29 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 26 30 DATA 3 3 A0319 26 31 EN DATA ERR-T A0319 26 32 MEV MB MB A0319 26 33 29.7 4.0 0.6 A0319 26 34 34.3 35. 5.6 A0319 26 35 39.6 78. 13. A0319 26 36 ENDDATA 5 0 A0319 26 37 ENDSUBENT 36 0 A0319 2699999 SUBENT A0319027 20231225 A105A0319 27 1 BIB 8 27 A0319 27 2 REACTION M(47-AG-109(A,3N)49-IN-110-M,,SIG,,,DERIV) A0319 27 3 G(47-AG-109(A,3N)49-IN-110-G,,SIG,,,DERIV) A0319 27 4 SAMPLE The target stacks consisted up to three 12.E-3 gr/cm2 A0319 27 5 thick natural silver (99.99% pure). A0319 27 6 METHOD (BCINT) A0319 27 7 ANALYSIS Derived from elemental cross section A0319 27 8 and 107Ag isotopic cross section A0319 27 9 DECAY-DATA (49-IN-110-M,69.1MIN,DG,657.7,0.979) A0319 27 10 (49-IN-110-G,4.9HR,DG,657.7,0.989, A0319 27 11 DG,707.4,0.312, A0319 27 12 DG,884.6,0.95, A0319 27 13 DG,937.5,0.697) A0319 27 14 The contribution of the In-110m to this peak was A0319 27 15 subtracted. A0319 27 16 ERR-ANALYSG(ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~14.%) includes all A0319 27 17 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 27 18 M(ERR-T,40.) Only a rough lower limit estimation A0319 27 19 of the error is given. See ERR-ANALYS in Subent 001. A0319 27 20 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 7 A0319 27 21 (DEP,A0319011) 107Ag(He3,3n)110In data A0319 27 22 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: In-110g and In-110m were swapped A0319 27 23 following their half-lives. STATUS added. BIB update. A0319 27 24 hl=4.9 min -> 4.9 hl in DECAY-DATA. A0319 27 25 (20200201A) SD: Small correction in ERR-ANALYS. A0319 27 26 ANALYSIS added. SF8=A deleted; SF9=DERIV added to A0319 27 27 REACTION code. ANALYSIS added. STATUS updated. A0319 27 28 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 27 29 ENDBIB 27 0 A0319 27 30 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 27 31 DATA 4 6 A0319 27 32 EN DATA MDATA GERR-T G A0319 27 33 MEV MB MB MB A0319 27 34 31.9 125. 583. 81.6 A0319 27 35 36.7 49. 807. 81. A0319 27 36 40.8 43. 789. 110.5 A0319 27 37 45.5 6.6 369. 82. A0319 27 38 49.5 6.5 191. 30. A0319 27 39 54.0 91. 12.7 A0319 27 40 ENDDATA 8 0 A0319 27 41 ENDSUBENT 40 0 A0319 2799999 SUBENT A0319028 20231225 A105A0319 28 1 BIB 9 22 A0319 28 2 REACTION (47-AG-109(A,4N)49-IN-109,,SIG,,,DERIV) A0319 28 3 ANALYSIS Derived from elemental cross section and 107Ag A0319 28 4 isotopic cross section. A0319 28 5 SAMPLE The target stacks consisted up to three 12.E-3 gr/cm2 A0319 28 6 thick natural silver (99.99% pure). A0319 28 7 METHOD (BCINT) A0319 28 8 DECAY-DATA (49-IN-109-G,4.2HR,DG,204.,0.68) A0319 28 9 The contribution of In-107 to this peak is subtracted. A0319 28 10 (49-IN-109-M1,1.34MIN) 100% isomeric transition. A0319 28 11 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~12.%) includes all A0319 28 12 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 28 13 COMMENT Measurement performed after the decay of the metastableA0319 28 14 state. The cross section calculated are the sum of theA0319 28 15 cross sections of both isomeric states. A0319 28 16 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 7 A0319 28 17 (DEP,A0319012) see ANALYSIS in Subent 001. A0319 28 18 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: STATUS added. BIB updated. A0319 28 19 SF4=In-109g -> In-109; SF5=M+ deleted from REACTION A0319 28 20 code (see COMMENT). A0319 28 21 (20200401A) SD: SF8=A deleted, SF9=DERIV added in A0319 28 22 REACTION code. ANALYSIS added. A0319 28 23 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 28 24 ENDBIB 22 0 A0319 28 25 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 28 26 DATA 3 21 A0319 28 27 EN DATA ERR-T A0319 28 28 MEV MB MB A0319 28 29 40.8 242. 29.0 A0319 28 30 45.2 627. 75.2 A0319 28 31 45.5 503. 60.4 A0319 28 32 49.5 639. 76.7 A0319 28 33 54.0 597. 68. A0319 28 34 57.6 448. 53.8 A0319 28 35 59.1 422. 50.6 A0319 28 36 61.0 286. 34.3 A0319 28 37 64.1 255. 30. A0319 28 38 64.6 203. 24.4 A0319 28 39 68.0 148. 17.8 A0319 28 40 69.4 159. 19.1 A0319 28 41 72.1 123. 14. A0319 28 42 74.7 118. 14.2 A0319 28 43 77.3 111. 13. A0319 28 44 80.0 81. 9.7 A0319 28 45 84.7 67. 8.0 A0319 28 46 86.2 72. 8.6 A0319 28 47 86.9 52. 6.2 A0319 28 48 89.1 48. 5.8 A0319 28 49 96.3 61. 7.3 A0319 28 50 ENDDATA 23 0 A0319 28 51 ENDSUBENT 50 0 A0319 2899999 SUBENT A0319029 20231225 A105A0319 29 1 BIB 8 20 A0319 29 2 REACTION (47-AG-109(A,5N)49-IN-108-G,,SIG,,,DERIV) A0319 29 3 ANALYSIS Derived from elemental cross section and 107Ag A0319 29 4 isotopic cross section. A0319 29 5 SAMPLE The target stacks consisted up to three 12.E-3 gr/cm2 A0319 29 6 thick natural silver (99.99% pure). A0319 29 7 METHOD (BCINT) A0319 29 8 DECAY-DATA (49-IN-108-G,58.MIN,DG,387.6,0.13, A0319 29 9 DG,633.2,1., A0319 29 10 DG,876.,0.85, A0319 29 11 DG,1032.3,0.20, A0319 29 12 DG,1056.3,0.25) A0319 29 13 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~22.%) includes all A0319 29 14 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 29 15 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 7 A0319 29 16 (DEP,A0319013) see ANALYSIS in Subent 001. A0319 29 17 HISTORY (20160130U) SD: STATUS added. BIB updated. A0319 29 18 (20200401A) SD: SF8=A deleted, SF9=DERIV added in A0319 29 19 REACTION code. ANALYSIS added. A0319 29 20 (20231225A) SD: SF4=In-108-M -> In-108-G in A0319 29 21 in REACTION code and DECAY-DATA. STATUS updated. A0319 29 22 ENDBIB 20 0 A0319 29 23 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 29 24 DATA 3 17 A0319 29 25 EN DATA ERR-T A0319 29 26 MEV MB MB A0319 29 27 49.5 15. 3.3 A0319 29 28 54.0 105. 40. A0319 29 29 57.6 187. 41.1 A0319 29 30 59.1 258. 50. A0319 29 31 61.0 275. 60.5 A0319 29 32 64.1 334. 73.5 A0319 29 33 64.6 292. 64.2 A0319 29 34 68.0 268. 59.0 A0319 29 35 69.4 268. 59.0 A0319 29 36 72.1 231. 45. A0319 29 37 74.7 183. 40.3 A0319 29 38 77.3 189. 38. A0319 29 39 80.0 111. 24.4 A0319 29 40 84.7 88. 19.4 A0319 29 41 86.2 89. 19.6 A0319 29 42 86.9 63. 13.9 A0319 29 43 89.1 57. 10. A0319 29 44 ENDDATA 19 0 A0319 29 45 ENDSUBENT 44 0 A0319 2999999 SUBENT A0319030 20231225 A105A0319 30 1 BIB 9 22 A0319 30 2 REACTION (47-AG-109(A,6N)49-IN-107,,SIG,,,DERIV) A0319 30 3 ANALYSIS Derived from elemental cross section and 107Ag A0319 30 4 isotopic cross section. A0319 30 5 SAMPLE The target stacks consisted up to three 12.E-3 gr/cm2 A0319 30 6 thick natural silver (99.99% pure). A0319 30 7 METHOD (BCINT) A0319 30 8 DECAY-DATA (49-IN-107-G,32.4MIN,DG,205.0,0.485) A0319 30 9 The Contribution of In-109 to this peak is subtracted. A0319 30 10 (49-IN-107-M,52.SEC) 100% isomeric transition. A0319 30 11 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~33.%) includes all A0319 30 12 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 30 13 COMMENT - By Authors: Measurement performed after the decay ofA0319 30 14 the metastable state. The cross sections calculated A0319 30 15 are the sum of the cross sections of both states. A0319 30 16 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 7 A0319 30 17 (DEP,A0319014) see ANALYSIS in Subent 001. A0319 30 18 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: STATUS added. BIB updated. A0319 30 19 SF4=In-107g -> In-107; SF5=M+ deleted from REACTION A0319 30 20 code (see COMMENT). A0319 30 21 (20200401A) SD: SF8=A deleted, SF9=DERIV added in A0319 30 22 REACTION code. ANALYSIS added. A0319 30 23 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 30 24 ENDBIB 22 0 A0319 30 25 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 30 26 DATA 3 13 A0319 30 27 EN DATA ERR-T A0319 30 28 MEV MB MB A0319 30 29 61.0 31. 10.2 A0319 30 30 64.1 51. 39. A0319 30 31 64.6 43. 14.2 A0319 30 32 68.0 63. 20.8 A0319 30 33 69.4 72. 23.8 A0319 30 34 72.1 48. 15. A0319 30 35 74.7 109. 36.0 A0319 30 36 77.3 134. 35. A0319 30 37 80.0 134. 44.2 A0319 30 38 84.7 102. 33.7 A0319 30 39 86.2 117. 16. A0319 30 40 86.9 68. 22.4 A0319 30 41 89.1 68. 12. A0319 30 42 ENDDATA 15 0 A0319 30 43 ENDSUBENT 42 0 A0319 3099999 SUBENT A0319031 20231225 A105A0319 31 1 BIB 7 13 A0319 31 2 REACTION (47-AG-107(A,X)48-CD-104,,SIG) A0319 31 3 METHOD (BCINT) A0319 31 4 SAMPLE (47-AG-107,ENR=0.9854) The target stacks consisted up A0319 31 5 to three 7.87E-3 gr/cm2 thick 98.54% enriched A0319 31 6 107-Ag foils interspersed by aluminum catcher foil. A0319 31 7 DECAY-DATA (48-CD-104,57.7MIN,DG,83.5,0.80) A0319 31 8 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Average uncertainty (~14.%) includes all A0319 31 9 sources mentioned in ERR-ANALYS (see Subent 001). A0319 31 10 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 6 A0319 31 11 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: STATUS added. BIB update. SF3=6N+P -> XA0319 31 12 in REACTION code. A0319 31 13 (20200201A) SD: SF5=IND deleted from REACTION code. A0319 31 14 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 31 15 ENDBIB 13 0 A0319 31 16 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 31 17 DATA 3 8 A0319 31 18 EN DATA ERR-T A0319 31 19 MEV MB MB A0319 31 20 80.0 13. 1.8 A0319 31 21 84.7 24. 3.4 A0319 31 22 86.2 31. 6.0 A0319 31 23 86.8 31. 4.3 A0319 31 24 89.1 37. 5.2 A0319 31 25 91.8 39. 4.0 A0319 31 26 96.3 69. 9.7 A0319 31 27 96.8 70. 8.0 A0319 31 28 ENDDATA 10 0 A0319 31 29 ENDSUBENT 28 0 A0319 3199999 SUBENT A0319032 20231225 A105A0319 32 1 BIB 7 19 A0319 32 2 REACTION (47-AG-109(A,7N)49-IN-106-M,,SIG,,,DERIV) A0319 32 3 SAMPLE The target stacks consisted up to three 12.E-3 gr/cm2 A0319 32 4 thick natural silver (99.99% pure). A0319 32 5 METHOD (BCINT) A0319 32 6 ANALYSIS Derived from elemental cross section A0319 32 7 and 107Ag isotopic cross section A0319 32 8 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T,40.) Only a rough lower limit estimation A0319 32 9 of the error is given. The uncertainty due to the A0319 32 10 analysis of the gamma-spectra differs from case to caseA0319 32 11 Much greater uncertainties were taken into account in A0319 32 12 those cases where complex peak evaluation and A0319 32 13 subtraction of activities could not be avoided during A0319 32 14 the calculation of the cross sections. A0319 32 15 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 7 A0319 32 16 (DEP,A0319015) 107Ag(alpha,5n)106mIn data A0319 32 17 HISTORY (20160130U) SD: STATUS added. BIB update. A0319 32 18 (20200201A) SD: SF8=A deleted; SF9=DERIV added to A0319 32 19 REACTION code. ANALYSIS added.ERR-ANALYS,STATUS updatedA0319 32 20 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 32 21 ENDBIB 19 0 A0319 32 22 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 32 23 DATA 2 6 A0319 32 24 EN DATA A0319 32 25 MEV MB A0319 32 26 80.0 13. A0319 32 27 84.7 23. A0319 32 28 86.2 31. A0319 32 29 86.9 35. A0319 32 30 89.1 31. A0319 32 31 96.3 55. A0319 32 32 ENDDATA 8 0 A0319 32 33 ENDSUBENT 32 0 A0319 3299999 SUBENT A0319033 20231225 A105A0319 33 1 BIB 9 24 A0319 33 2 REACTION (47-AG-109(A,X)48-CD-107,,SIG,,,DERIV) A0319 33 3 SAMPLE The target stacks consisted up to three 12.E-3 gr/cm2 A0319 33 4 thick natural silver (99.99% pure). A0319 33 5 METHOD (BCINT) A0319 33 6 ANALYSIS Derived from elemental cross section A0319 33 7 and 107Ag isotopic cross section A0319 33 8 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T,40.) Only a rough lower limit estimation A0319 33 9 of the error is given. The uncertainty due to the A0319 33 10 analysis of the gamma-spectra differs from case to caseA0319 33 11 Much greater uncertainties were taken into account in A0319 33 12 those cases where complex peak evaluation and A0319 33 13 subtraction of activities could not be avoided during A0319 33 14 the calculation of the cross sections. A0319 33 15 DECAY-DATA (48-CD-107,6.5HR,DG,93.1,0.046) A0319 33 16 COMMENT Measured by means of the isomeric transition Ag-107m A0319 33 17 -> Ag-107g after the establishment of the equilibrium. A0319 33 18 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 7 A0319 33 19 (DEP,A0319016) 107Ag(alpha,x)107Cd data A0319 33 20 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: SF3=5N+P -> X in REACTION code. A0319 33 21 BIB update. A0319 33 22 (20200201A) SD: SF5=IND and SF8=A deleted; SF9=DERIV A0319 33 23 added to REACTION code. ANALYSIS added. ERR-ANALYS, A0319 33 24 STATUS updated. A0319 33 25 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 33 26 ENDBIB 24 0 A0319 33 27 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 33 28 DATA 2 10 A0319 33 29 EN DATA A0319 33 30 MEV MB A0319 33 31 64.6 50. A0319 33 32 68.0 67. A0319 33 33 69.4 140. A0319 33 34 72.1 215. A0319 33 35 74.7 216. A0319 33 36 77.3 374. A0319 33 37 80.0 241. A0319 33 38 84.7 210. A0319 33 39 86.9 183. A0319 33 40 89.1 152. A0319 33 41 ENDDATA 12 0 A0319 33 42 ENDSUBENT 41 0 A0319 3399999 SUBENT A0319034 20231225 A105A0319 34 1 BIB 8 12 A0319 34 2 REACTION (29-CU-65(HE3,2N)31-GA-66,,SIG) A0319 34 3 MONITOR (29-CU-65(HE3,2N)31-GA-66,,SIG) A0319 34 4 DECAY-DATA (31-GA-66,9.3HR,DG,1039.5,0.3732) A0319 34 5 DECAY-MON (31-GA-66,9.3HR,DG,1039.5,0.3732) A0319 34 6 MONIT-REF (T0120019,N.W.Golchert+,J,NP/A,152,419,1970). Average A0319 34 7 values for monitor reaction cross sections were used. A0319 34 8 ERR-ANALYS (MONIT-ERR) An estimated uncertainty of 10% due to the A0319 34 9 use of a monitor reaction A0319 34 10 STATUS (TABLE,,P.Misaelides+,J,JIN,42,937,1980) Tbl. 8 A0319 34 11 HISTORY (20160130A) SD: Col. MISC -> MONIT in DATA section. A0319 34 12 BIB update. hl=93.hr -> 9.3hr in DECAY-DATA. A0319 34 13 (20231225U) SD: STATUS updated. A0319 34 14 ENDBIB 12 0 A0319 34 15 NOCOMMON 0 0 A0319 34 16 DATA 3 11 A0319 34 17 EN DATA MONIT A0319 34 18 MEV MB MB A0319 34 19 12.7 105. 160. A0319 34 20 16.7 178. 165. A0319 34 21 20.2 97. 100. A0319 34 22 23.0 74. 69. A0319 34 23 23.4 96. 65. A0319 34 24 25.8 46. 48. A0319 34 25 28.6 32. 35. A0319 34 26 31.0 23. 23. A0319 34 27 33.5 23. 22. A0319 34 28 36.4 15. A0319 34 29 39.6 12. A0319 34 30 ENDDATA 13 0 A0319 34 31 ENDSUBENT 30 0 A0319 3499999 ENDENTRY 34 0 A031999999999